Climate Change!

The climate changes!  That is a fact.  Before the ice age, the temperatures were warmer, then the ice age hit, then they eventually warmed up again.  There have bee an estimated 5 or so ice ages that can be detected.  Hu… LONG before the industrial age, plastic straws, SUVs, and mass agricultural farting cows.  What is more sad is the fact that the reports used to justify financially punishing people, aren’t logically and mathematically reliable due to selfish human manipulation, willfully leaving out certain data, and even fudging the numbers…

So, it is illogical and ignorant to say that climate change is caused by deforestation, oil spills, air travel, and bla bla bla.

California is burning!

Uneducated blind sheep will point to the fires in California as evidences of man caused climate change that is negatively effecting wildlife and human life.  Well, first of all, if the fire was caused naturally and spread naturally, why is that not considered a part of nature?  Aside from that self defeating argument, when we consider the information that was put out by National Climate Assessment we are LEAD to believe that, oh my goodness, the amount of acres being burned is steadily increasing!


OH NO…. but wait, why does their data sheet start in 1980 and not at in the early 1900s?  Well, lets just find the data prior to 1980…


Well, that’s interesting.  An entire half century was left out… doesn’t look so bad now when we compare it to the first half of the century.  This is what we call presentation manipulation.   This data is nation wide.  But when we just focus on California we see that the average acres burned in the past 80 years is down and still treading down.


Arctic Sea Ice

A lot of pseudo-climatologist will claim that sea ice is melting and will raise the ocean levels.  What they DON’T tell you, either because they don’t know or purposefully don’t want to tell you is that arctic sea ice is at the highest volumes since 2006.  And when comparing data over the past decade, you see a pattern of annual growth and shrinkage of ice.   So when they say ” oh no the ice is shrinking!!!” its because that happens every year… like natural clock work.  Even the arctic temperatures are averaging the same as the 1950s-2000s average.  (see data)DMIArcticSeaIceVolume_shadow

But the ocean sea levels are rising!  Aren’t they?

World-leading sea-level expert Prof. emeritus Nils Axel Mörner gave a presentation in 2018 where he discussed actual sea level data.  The actual overall averaged oceanic increase in the past 125 years can be estimated as modest at 0.9 mm per year.  Stockholm’s tide record is the second longest in Europe; the mean long-term change in sea level is a decline of 3.8 mm per year.   The country itself is rising 4.9 mm per year due to the post-glacial rise of the continental landmass. The difference of 1.1 mm per year is the true oceanic component.  Nova Scotia: sea level 700mm higher back in the 16th century.  The Indian Ocean and the Pacific, in the 17th century, the sea level was 70 cm higher.  Sea level at Fiji Islands, Maldives, Goa has dropped since the 1950s.  [2]

So, are sea levels rising? Yes and no.  Depending on where you live.  BUT given the historical data and historical patterns, the rise and fall of sea levels IS NATURAL.

Researchers at King’s College London found that the research study by Penn state to be extremely inaccurate.  And all the talking points proclaiming the apocalyptic rise of the oceans is not true, or accurate [4].

Oh but there are holes and huge cracks forming in the Arctic Glaciers.  Yes, this is true; but instead of being an ignorant puppet of stupidity and assume by default its all the fault of man caused global warming, use your brain, and educate your self.   Did you know there are volcanoes under the glaciers?  91 volcanoes have been identified, literally, under the arctic glaciers [5][6][7].  Even if these volcanoes were to melt these glaciers, the water level would not change.  The water is already displaced by the glacier, and the melting of the glacier would take up the same total space and volume as it does already.    None the less there are plenty of studies explaining that the changes in the arctic glaciers is caused by plate tectonics and volcanoes [8] and not SUVs, hair-spray, and anything man caused.

CO2 and Global Warming

We have been told for years that the increase in CO2 will cause the earths temperatures to rise and kill all life on earth as we know it… Actually, its not.  We see that CO2 is rising yes, but the temperature is not even following CO2 changes.  Much like the natural trends of ice ages, arctic ice, we see that there are even natural trends in the earths CO2 levels.  [3]


There is another scientific explanation for global warming that is far too nerdy for me to rephrase, so I will quote them instead:

NASA space weather observations, extremely low sunspot counts, and a severe Polar Vortex are consistent with cyclical global cooling onset.

The complex flows of ions and electrons inside the sun produce sunspots that average about ten times the size of Earth and have magnetic fields that are ten thousand times stronger than the Earth’s magnetic field.

Sunspots were first observed by Galileo in the early 1600s and have been scientifically tracked as 11-year cycles since 1755.

The U.S. National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration’s Space Weather Prediction Center uses NASA’s Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics satellite conducts Sunspot Number Progression counts, measures F10.7cm Radio Flux and the Ap Index geomagnetic activity, and its SABER carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO) instruments gage infrared solar output in Earth’s top atmospheric level.

As the Earth was completing Solar Cycle 24, sunspot counts and magnetic activity were expected cyclically fall from its high of over 100 in 2014 to a low of zero in 2022. But the sunspot count plunged to zero in mid-2018 and has remained substantially lower than forecast for Solar Cycle 25.

The data could indicate the onset of a super cycle ‘Maunder Minimum.’ The last Maunder Minimum period from 1645 to 1715 was a period with 7 percent fewer sunspots and global cooling, referred to as the ‘Little Ice Age.’[10]

So lets us simple logic now.  If a reduced amount of sunspots influences global cooling, than an increased amount of sunspots would logically influence global warming.  And last I checked, mankind is not in control of sunspots.[9]

The Fraud

Don’t be fooled by fancy images and politicians.   They get control and money through manipulating the data, to manipulate ignorant minds.  Keep in mind what we first exposed about National Climate Assessment.

Climate Central published this alarming image.  Makes you think the winters are getting warming and warmer.  That’s exactly what they want you to think…


But when we look at the actual data, we see a very different truthful trend.


Here we see the average temperatures from 1920 to 2016 actually trending down, not up.

There were predominate Climate Scientists how have had their emails hacked.  Their emails have revealed some very savage things.  Check out this email from this sciensist who’s research is often used.

“I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI [Freedom of Information] Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process,”writes Phil Jones, a scientist working with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

And these scientists were so arrogant about their data manipulation they kept talking about hiding it.

“Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden,” Jones writes in another newly released email. “I’ve discussed this with the main funder (U.S. Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.”

They are even aware of a problem in their research that they didn’t want anyone to know about!

“Mike, can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith [Briffa] re AR4 [UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 4th Assessment]?” Jones wrote to Penn State University scientist Michael Mann in an email “Keith will do likewise. … We will be getting Caspar [Ammann] to do likewise. I see that CA [the Climate Audit Web site] claim they discovered the 1945 problem in the Nature paper!!”

Then, to avoid, any future problems in their research papers, they arbitrary pick and choose what data and information to use and put in their papers…

“The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guid[e] what’s included and what is left out” of IPCC reports, writes Jonathan Overpeck, coordinating lead author for the IPCC’s most recent climate assessment.

See, its not about truth and real science.  Its about a “cause” that they need to push for, even if it is not in the numbers.  And they are willing to sacrifice fellow scientists in this cause.

“I gave up on [Georgia Institute of Technology climate professor] Judith Curry a while ago. I don’t know what she thinks she’s doing, but its not helping the cause,” wrote Mann

These climate scientist shit bags even look to black mail and destroy the careers of other scientists who disagree with their papers.

“I have been talking w/ folks in the states about finding an investigative journalist to investigate and expose [skeptical scientist Steve McIntyre], said Mann.

These guys are so driven by their own opinionated agenda, they even toss around the idea of changing how the peer review system should work for their agenda’s benefit.   Tom Wigley, a scientist at the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, authored some of the leaked emails in which he asserting that his fellow Climategate scientists “must get rid of” the editor for a peer-reviewed science journal because he published some papers contradicting assertions of a global warming crisis.

But, some in the climate science community challenged and disagreed with those who push the man caused global warming research.

“Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the tropical troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and discount a wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We need to communicate the uncertainty and be honest. Phil, hopefully we can find time to discuss these further if necessary,” writes Peter Thorne of the UK Met Office.

“I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run,” Thorne adds.

“Mike, The Figure you sent is very deceptive … there have been a number of dishonest presentations of model results by individual authors and by IPCC,” Wigley acknowledges.[12][13]

The issue here, in the light of all this, is that you can’t even trust the research of man-caused global warming.  You must have a religious blind faith in it.  Man-caused Global Warming is more like an extremist religious cult.


Yes Climate Change does exist.  Yes, the earth gets hot over time.  Yes, the earth gets cold over time.  Yes, the glaciers melt.  Yes, the glaciers expand.  There is such a thing as global warming and there is such a thing as global cooling.  THE ISSUE is what causes it.  Welp, given the RELIABLE research of sunspots, volcanic activity, historical data prior to Al Gore inventing the internet, we can logically see that it is NOT caused by mankind.

So, all you Climate Change militant religious cultish extremest are hopeless.  If they can’t see the bullshit they have faith in at this point, there is no hope for them now.

Yes, everyone should recycle.  Yes, everyone should take care of animals and the environment.  Not because we are causing global warming, or an ice age, or sea levels to rise and kill us all (which none of that is supported by reliable studies); but because it is the decent respectful honorable human thing to do.

Take your “New Green Deal” you cultish blind religious nature nut jobs and shove it.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: